altitude hold problem w/ altimatic IIIB

altitude hold problem w/ altimatic IIIB

Postby N8632Y » Sun Jan 25, 2009 9:10 pm

PA30-1773 N8632Y
User avatar
N8632Y
ICS member
ICS member
 
Posts: 208
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 3:56 pm
Location: N14 South Jersey

Postby MillenniumFlight » Sun Jan 25, 2009 11:40 pm

MillenniumFlight
ICS member
ICS member
 
Posts: 25
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 3:13 pm

Postby N8632Y » Mon Jan 26, 2009 1:40 pm

PA30-1773 N8632Y
User avatar
N8632Y
ICS member
ICS member
 
Posts: 208
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 3:56 pm
Location: N14 South Jersey

Autopilot

Postby Scott Ducey » Mon Jan 26, 2009 4:08 pm

User avatar
Scott Ducey
ICS member
ICS member
 
Posts: 313
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 2:11 pm

Postby Zach Grant L1011jock » Mon Jan 26, 2009 4:49 pm

"Keep it above 5 feet and don't do nuthin dumb!"
User avatar
Zach Grant L1011jock
Technical Advisor
 
Posts: 1404
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 4:35 pm
Location: Indianapolis KEYE

Postby N8632Y » Mon Jan 26, 2009 5:10 pm

PA30-1773 N8632Y
User avatar
N8632Y
ICS member
ICS member
 
Posts: 208
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 3:56 pm
Location: N14 South Jersey

Postby Kristin Winter » Tue Jan 27, 2009 4:48 am

Another thing to check with the IIIB is whether the cable which runs from the control head in the panel, to the computer box under the panel, really works properly. I recently had one of the receptacle ears break off, which meant that no matter how I adjusted the altitude, it did not change the setting in the computer, because the cable turned, but didn't engage.
Kristin
User avatar
Kristin Winter
ICS member
ICS member
 
Posts: 1299
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2005 5:21 pm
Location: Northern California

Postby MillenniumFlight » Tue Jan 27, 2009 7:43 pm

I agree with the other posts in this thread that connector integrity is a likely culprit, particularly after having work done on the panel. The Altimatic IIIB has multiple units -- controller, altitude unit, nav radio interface, autoflight system, amplifier and servos -- interfaced with each-other and with the artificial horizon and HSI / DG through a birds-nest of wiring. Plenty there that could go wrong!

No question, the STEC 55X is the unit of choice, if money is available. Because I fly single-pilot hard IFR, having an inoperative autopilot did not seem to be a sensible option for me. I looked into the S-Tec system 30, which had most of the 55X functionality but at lower cost: but I was quoted $18K installed, by the local instrument shop, and over $20K from the nearest Piper dealer. That's when I got interested in rehabilitating the Altimatic.

With the repair of the pitot / static lines, and some tweaking, I now have an excellent state-of-the-art-in-the-1970's autopilot, capable of climbs, descents, holds, heading-bug navigation, VOR Navigation, GPS navigation (though not yet GPSS equipped)...... it will intercept, capture and follow the ILS reliably, and I have flown several GPS approaches without incident (no WAAS yet, though the autopilot would be capable enough, I think, if I had the correct navigator!)

There's an art to flying the Altimatic smoothly. I use the pitch selector for climbs and descents, rather than changing the altitude selector. Before engaging pitch hold, make sure the needle is centered to avoid abrupt pitch changes. Once the pitch is selected, I adjust the altitude preselector to the approximate target altitude. As we get close (say 200 feet to go), I progressively adjust pitch towards level flight, and tweak the preselect (using the indicator needle as a guide), switching back to altitude hold once the needle is centered at the chosen altitude. One of the advantages of the IIIB unit is the auto-trim feature, which works beautifully, leaving the trim near-perfect any time you choose to revert to hand-flying.

Although it's certainly more complex to use than a modern digital unit, it's actually fairly easy to master after a few hours of practice.... and it's certainly MUCH better than not having an autopilot, for a tiny fraction of the cost.

It will have to do me for a year or two until I can save up my pennies for something fancier!

Bryan McIver
1969 PA-30
N8807Y
MillenniumFlight
ICS member
ICS member
 
Posts: 25
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 3:13 pm

Postby N8632Y » Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:54 pm

Bryan,
I agree, the altimatic has been a very capable SIC, and I was very comfortable with course reversals, capturing glideslope, climbs, etc, I had GPSS installed with the 530W and the racetrack is picture perfect, holds are easy, etc.
I do like to hand fly as much as possible and use the autopilot when i'm busy, and then I can monitor the aircraft systems, review approach plates, follow maps, etc.
The 530W and autopilot can make you lazy, something I never want to be. In charge, ahead of the plane, ahead of ATC, weather and prepared for the unexpected.
I'd like to fix the old autopilot, cause 20K can buy alot of fuel!
Cold weather, I'll be looking at her over the weekend, and all the posts.
Thanks to everyone.
steve
PA30-1773 N8632Y
User avatar
N8632Y
ICS member
ICS member
 
Posts: 208
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 3:56 pm
Location: N14 South Jersey

Postby Hansmeister » Tue Jan 27, 2009 11:33 pm

Brian,

You may want to talk to John van Bladeren about an autopilot quote. This is not the time of year to be going to Portland, but his expertise and competitive pricing is worth the trip.

JvB put in the Century 2000 for me, and it is every bit as good as the STEC 60-2. The GPSS is built-in to the Aspen 1000 Pro. Both for a little more than your Piper quote.
User avatar
Hansmeister
ICS member
ICS member
 
Posts: 802
Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2002 5:44 pm
Location: Kah-li-forn-yah

Postby AlanBreen » Sat Jan 31, 2009 12:37 am

User avatar
AlanBreen
ICS member
ICS member
 
Posts: 557
Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2002 6:57 am
Location: Hamilton, New Zealand


Return to Maintenance - Avionics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests

cron