A client and friend bought a plane (a late model Cirrus) a couple years ago and was hurting from the cost of the two annuals he's been through. I can feel his pain. I shared my learnings with him and after finishing the email I thought I might post it here in case someone else might learn from my problems. I have always received great feedback from fellow Comanche owners and would appreciate any feedback anyone may have on my learnings below. So without further ado following is the maintenance related exerpt from the email:
"I was talking to the owner of the shop I use for my plane and during that discussion I asked him about his experience with Cirrus. He said that it was a good reliable plane and that annuals may typically run a few thousand. I mentioned that I knew someone that had spent a good deal more and his response was interesting and I thought I would pass it along. There can be more than one check list for an annual, one approved by the FAA and the other that comes from the manufacturer. He thought that the annual check list that comes from Cirrus seemed to him to be much more involved, thus more expensive than the one approved by the FAA. Still, that wouldn’t make up for what you were experiencing.
I’m going on 5 years with my Comanche. I had a lot of things to learn about using the plane, most of which I was able to figure out the first year. Maintenance was a different matter. It has been only recently that I can say that the light at the end of the tunnel is in plain view now. Below are a few bullet points I have learned. It’s been an expensive learning process but this is where I’m at right now;
• Trust and verify. I had to become very knowledgeable about the Comanche and its specific characteristics. Maintenance shops work on far too many different makes to become very good at any of them (in spite of what they might say). Don’t necessarily believe what you are told, check it out.
• I joined the Comanche Society and found them to be very valuable. Their support has been crucial through the whole process. I can’t express this enough. Most makes have such organizations.
• I have an issue with an airfoil and ran into a dead end until I finally called the factory (Piper). They have people whose job it is to handle questions from people like me. Now, I will call them anytime a design related issue comes up.
• The maintenance shops mark up parts by a factor of 2x or 3x. Shocking but true. For my Comanche I have been putting together a list of sources for parts. These are sources that specialize in Comanche components. The shops have their sources that supply parts but what I have found is that they cannot take the time to fish around for sources so they have only a few places they buy everything from. This causes the parts to go through one more stage of mark ups. Soon I will be ordering my own (Comanche specific) parts for the shop. (By the way, it is surprising how much you can find on eBay.)
• Except for minor problems no work gets started until I receive an estimate, written. That estimate is questioned until I am satisfied that they know what they are doing and nothing is padded.
• Every “squawk” they find during the inspection gets reviewed, item by item, by me before any work starts. I make them split out the airworthy issues from the “nice to fix issues” or “should be fixed”, then I decide what gets done and how it gets done. Also, I assume nothing when it comes to what is deemed an “airworthy” issue, I make them justify it. None of this “because I say so” crap.
• By the way, any time you hear the word “should”, grab hold of your wallet.
• During the first few annuals I was told that they need to fix as they go, that it would be much less expensive…BULL. My instructions now are that only the inspection is authorized. No work is to be done until the inspection is complete, the airworthiness squawks have been identified, and estimates developed for each item. I then go down the list and check off those that have my approval.
• Shortly after the annual, I do a thorough preflight inspection and perform a brief test flight. So far, there has been something that needed to be addressed. It takes a flight or two to get everything back to normal.
• The magic phrase. There is a very short and simple to understand phrase that I pull out when all else fails and it goes something like this, “…look, I’m the one in this plane zooming through the sky at 10,000 feet if something goes wrong…not you, so…”. The FAA makes you, the pilot, responsible to determine the airworthiness of the plane, not the mechanic. Sometimes I find the mechanic needs to be reminded of this.
• My Comanche is not a car. I no longer use the automobile as an analogy in any way. Strange as it may seem, this took me a while to learn.
• My mechanic is my partner. This represents a dramatic change in my view of the shop. The shop, I have learned, is not a place to take the plane when sometime is wrong, rather it is a place to take the plane to fix something that will go wrong BEFORE it goes wrong. This takes team work. I’m still working this.
• Mechanics are not dishonest nor incompetent, just human.
So these are my leanings so far and I hope some of this might be helpful to you. For business and family reasons I feel I need to keep the plane and make it work so I’m willing to slug it out. Fortunately, there is progress however slow and painful."