Turbo Twinkie Specs

Turbo Twinkie Specs

Postby T210DRVR » Fri Jan 16, 2009 2:22 pm

What is the service ceiling for a factory twin turbo Comanche?

I'm told cruise speeds of 180-190 kts are realistic for the turbo in the mid-teens. Does that sound about right?

Has anyone seen de-ice boots on a twin Comanche? Does the system work the same as larger piston aircraft with boots?

Thanks.
User avatar
T210DRVR
ICS member
ICS member
 
Posts: 117
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 4:31 am
Location: So. Oregon

Postby Jay » Fri Jan 16, 2009 6:27 pm

If I recall correctly, the ceiling of a turbo PA 30 is 30,000 feet. While I know owners who've been to FL 250 I personally think that FL 200 is about the practical limit. I've been that high several times and the airplane does just fine, although it is maybe just a teeny bit mushy compared to even FL 180.

For practical purposes, if the weather is bad enough that I can't get on top by 20,000 feet, then it's probably bad enough that I don't need to be flying around in a Comanche. IMHO.

Where the turbos really shine is in the mid teens. At that level the plane flies great and nasal cannulas (cannuli?, approved for use up to 18,000 feet) are reasonably comfortable. 180 KTS TAS at those altitudes is easily achievable. Assuming the turbo system is in good shape and you run a little harder you can get close to 200 KTS TAS.

There are booted Twin Comanches around, but I'll let someone who owns one comment on them.

Best,

Jay
Jay
PA 30 N7702Y
User avatar
Jay
ICS member
ICS member
 
Posts: 473
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2003 10:59 pm
Location: Portland, Oregon

Turbo Twinkie Specs

Postby Don Nelson » Fri Jan 16, 2009 9:11 pm

Jay, All,
I'm new to the TwinCo, but surprised this question would come up.
That's cause I've been stuydying the Doug Killough Turbo Twin handbook recently and it says the absolute ceiling is 25,000 feet.

Is the service ceiling different than the absolute ceiling?
OK, read it again and it gives both ceilings at 25,000- Multi-Engine.
But 8,800 for Service, and 12,600 for Absoulute - on one engine.
All at gross wt of 3,725 lbs.


BTW, I have a couple early/draft/sample copies of that handbook, available for $40 payable to ICS - if anyone is interested.

Don
User avatar
Don Nelson
ICS member
ICS member
 
Posts: 312
Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2003 5:57 pm
Location: Burlington, Washington; KBVS

Postby T210DRVR » Fri Jan 16, 2009 10:11 pm

Please PM the address you wish the check to be sent to. Those manuals are wonderful. I have one for my PA-28-180 and it is full of great information.

BTW, I am looking for a CFI in the Seattle area with at least 25 Twinco hours for insurance required check out if you know anyone.
User avatar
T210DRVR
ICS member
ICS member
 
Posts: 117
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 4:31 am
Location: So. Oregon

Postby Jay » Sat Jan 17, 2009 8:16 pm

Jay
PA 30 N7702Y
User avatar
Jay
ICS member
ICS member
 
Posts: 473
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2003 10:59 pm
Location: Portland, Oregon

Postby Charlie Tripp » Sun Jan 18, 2009 6:36 pm

From the Piper Turbo Twin Comanche B – Owners Handbook

Absolute Ceiling - 25,000
Service Ceiling - 25,000
Single Engine Absolute Ceiling - 12,600
Single engine Service Ceiling – 8,800
Top Speed at 20,000 – 240 mph
User avatar
Charlie Tripp
ICS member
ICS member
 
Posts: 382
Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2002 5:38 pm
Location: Brownsville, TN

Postby CLIPCLIP » Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:38 am

"Absolute Ceiling - 25,000
Service Ceiling - 25,000 "

IIRC, the 25,000' ceiling is an FAA requirement - an unpressurised A/C is restricted to 25,000' while performance-wise, a turbo twinky in good shape will make it to 30,000'

the fact that the stated absolute and the service ceilings are identical (see above quote) would seem to support that - normally the absolute ceiling, if performance based will be higher than the service ceiling.

françois
CLIPCLIP
ICS member
ICS member
 
Posts: 97
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 1999 2:06 am
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Postby Zach Grant L1011jock » Mon Jan 19, 2009 12:59 pm

I can confirm that the original aircraft was certified to 30K, and the old performance charts show this, however the requirement for either secondary supplimental O2 as well as standards and testing for emergency descent to non O2 altitudes were subsequantly instituted. They were not required for aircraft limited to FL250 and below. Rather than recertify the turbo PA-30, the FL 250 limitation was applied to the type, and the rest as they say, is history.
-Zach
"Keep it above 5 feet and don't do nuthin dumb!"
User avatar
Zach Grant L1011jock
Technical Advisor
 
Posts: 1404
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 4:35 pm
Location: Indianapolis KEYE

Postby Kristin Winter » Tue Jan 20, 2009 1:36 am

Kristin
User avatar
Kristin Winter
ICS member
ICS member
 
Posts: 1299
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2005 5:21 pm
Location: Northern California

Postby T210DRVR » Tue Jan 20, 2009 4:11 am

User avatar
T210DRVR
ICS member
ICS member
 
Posts: 117
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 4:31 am
Location: So. Oregon

Postby Kristin Winter » Tue Jan 20, 2009 4:21 am

Kristin
User avatar
Kristin Winter
ICS member
ICS member
 
Posts: 1299
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2005 5:21 pm
Location: Northern California


Return to Maintenance - General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 64 guests

cron