oat guage

oat guage

Postby paul » Mon Dec 29, 2008 3:29 am

paul
ICS member
ICS member
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 3:14 am

Postby Zach Grant L1011jock » Mon Dec 29, 2008 4:15 am

"Keep it above 5 feet and don't do nuthin dumb!"
User avatar
Zach Grant L1011jock
Technical Advisor
 
Posts: 1404
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 4:35 pm
Location: Indianapolis KEYE

Postby N3322G » Tue Dec 30, 2008 2:04 pm

Pat

Patricia Jayne (Pat) Keefer ICS 08899
PA-39 #10 Texas
User avatar
N3322G
ICS member
ICS member
 
Posts: 1911
Joined: Thu May 08, 2008 1:58 pm
Location: Fort Worth, Texas area

Postby Nick » Fri Feb 20, 2009 4:33 am

I bought the OAT digital temp guage a few years back. It was never accurate. Didn't matter whether it was hot or cold. I thought I just got a lemon so I bought a second one. I set the two guages next to one another on a table in a room with a digital thermostat control for the room. It registered the same as an old fashioned mercury thermometer. The two OAT guages gave varying temperatures that never matched the digital and mercury devices, (with neither of the OATs giving the same readout, although one was a little closer to the digital and mercury than the other). If you are going to be flying in a climate where you run the risk of flying in icing coniditions, I would not trust these devices when it comes to having a reasonably accurate measurement of the temperature. Go with the old probe style.
"A 40 Year Love Affair With the Comanche"
User avatar
Nick
ICS member
ICS member
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Sun May 18, 2008 4:23 pm


Return to Maintenance - General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests

cron